| 150525424400_542360007272 | Sevrin Robstad |
|
|
|
| |
| 145029814800_511160007167 | Message not availabl |
|
|
|
| |
| 145030004686_595660007060 | Molle Bestefich |
|
|
|
| |
| 168328524709_584860007943 | Francois Barre |
|
On Monday July 17, quackyo@xxxxxxxx wrote:
I have written some posts about this before... My 6 disk RAID 5 broke
down because of hardware failure. When I tried to get it upnrunning again
I did |
|
| |
| 173624184495_515560007014 | Francois Barre |
|
|
|
| |
| 156527524556_596660007271 | Tuomas Leikola |
|
|
|
| |
| 123726264252_503660007285 | Jeff Breidenbach |
|
|
|
| |
| 120421874284_589160007311 | Jeff Breidenbach |
|
|
|
| |
| 195228254162_566060007274 | Bill Davidsen |
|
|
|
| |
| 160324084693_509860007939 | Neil Brown |
|
Hi all,
I have a RAID6 array where a disk went bad. I removed the old disk, put in an
identical one, and repartitioned the new disk. I am now trying to add the
new partition to the array, but I |
|
| |
| 111221284691_566960007867 | Neil Brown |
|
Thanks for the reply, Neil. Here is my version:
[root@paul log]# mdadm --version
mdadm - v2.3.1 - 6 February 2006
This is a somewhat production system, running Fedora Core 5. Official
packages co |
|
| |
| 194023314492_519260007229 | Neil Brown |
|
Please, please! I am dead in the water!
To recap, I have a RAID6 array on a Fedora Core 5 system, using /dev/hd[acdeg]
2 and /dev/sd[ab]2. /dev/hdd went bad so I replaced the drive and tried to
ad |
|
| |
| 147725724416_576160007558 | Paul Waldo |
|
On Sunday 23 July 2006 07:25, Neil Brown wrote:
On Sunday July 23, pwaldo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Please, please! I am dead in the water!
To recap, I have a RAID6 array on a Fedora Core 5 |
|
| |
| 107124134383_523460007055 | Paul Waldo |
|
On Sunday July 23, pwaldo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
At this point, Id just be happy to be able to get the degraded array back up
and running. Is there any way to do that? Thanks!
mdadm --as |
|
| |
| 150926774463_520160007027 | Paul Waldo |
|
|
|
| |
| 114028884156_583260007250 | Paul Waldo |
|
|
|
| |
| 169824964581_518960007949 | Dan Graham |
|
On Sunday July 23, pwaldo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Here is the dmesg output. No log files are created with the FC5 rescue disk.
Thanks!
On Sunday 23 July 2006 07:59, Neil Brown wrote:
|
|
| |
| 141821654521_583560007984 | Paul Clements |
|
On Wed, 2 Aug 2006, Dan Graham wrote:
Hello;
I have an existing, active ext3 filesystem which I would like to convert to
a RAID 1 ext3 filesystem with minimal down time. After casting about |
|
| |
| 139229984397_577660007471 | Robert Heinzmann |
|
Paul Clements wrote:
Is 16 blocks a large enough area?
Maybe. The superblock will be between 64KB and 128KB from the end of the
partition. This depends on the size of the partition:
|
|
| |
| 183127414148_529460007924 | Paul Waldo |
|
Still no joy after zeroing the superblock, Mikael. :-(
[root@paul ~]# mdadm --examine /dev/hdd2
/dev/hdd2:
Magic : a92b4efc
Version : 00.90.00
UUID : 2e316d9e:20cac82a |
|
| |
| 132120834812_547760007368 | Neil Brown |
|
Hi i have small problem when i booting i have md1 as /boot md2 as swap
and md3 as / (root) and when it come to md3 it say something like "md3
has no identity information" i cant read it |
|
| |
| 172826124865_530860007553 | linuxmania lizhi |
|
A client of mine desperately wants a Dell solution rather than a
self-build. They are looking at an external Dell box with 15 x 500GB SATA
drives in it and a Dell 1U host controller - but the connec |
|
| |
| 125722194718_577860007644 | linuxmania lizhi |
|
On Thursday July 13, linuxmania.lizhi@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Hi all,
Im new to MD RAID. When I read the book "Understanding the Linux Kernel", I know that there are several layers between Fil |
|
| |
| 176224464642_515860007874 | Gordon Henderson |
|
Last year, there were discussions on this list about the possible
use of a co-processor (Intels IOP333) to compute raid 5/6s
parity data.
We are about to see low cost, multi core cpu chips with very |
|
| |
| 162920524615_577860007558 | Burn Alting |
|
|
|
| |
| 170126684641_551260007555 | Andrew Skolarz |
|
|
|
| |
| 188028734166_574460007968 | Andrew Skolarz |
|
|
|
| |
| 129624384187_501460007241 | Andrew Skolarz |
|
Am Mittwoch, 12. Juli 2006 06:10 schrieben Sie:
Care to enlighten the rest of us what did the trick?
Dex
please disregard this email .. after doing more google research i have
re-assembled the |
|
| |
| 165829784688_529960007910 | Justin Piszcz |
|
On Tuesday July 11, pletopia@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Checksum : 4aa9094a - expected 4aa908c4
This is a bit scary. You have a single-bit error, either in the
checksum or elsewhere in the superbloc |
|
| |
| 117327664963_578860007309 | Jan Engelhardt |
|
On Tuesday July 11, jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Neil,
It worked, echoing the 600 to the stripe width in /sys, however, how
come /dev/md3 says it is 0 MB when I type fdisk -l?
Is t |
|
| |
| 134522434977_598760007122 | Jan Engelhardt |
|
On Tuesday July 11, jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Neil,
It worked, echoing the 600 to the stripe width in /sys, however, how
come /dev/md3 says it is 0 MB when I type fdisk -l?
Is t |
|
| |
| 154126354995_570860007175 | David Greaves |
|
|
|
| |
| 167626764614_586460007830 | David Greaves |
|
|
|
| |
| 110423474808_579360007944 | Vladimir Strycek |
|
On Tuesday July 11, david@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Horrid stuff but important to many. Speaking of which, Neil, if you read
this - are the man pages under the GFDL or the GPL?
GPL.
Ill make that |
|
| |
| 170328204709_566560007251 | Vladimir Strycek |
|
On Tuesday July 11, david@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Horrid stuff but important to many. Speaking of which, Neil, if you read
this - are the man pages under the GFDL or the GPL?
GPL.
Ill make that |
|
| |
| 197529534495_595160007250 | Mario BitKoenig Holb |
|
Hello Vladimir,
Tuesday, July 11, 2006, 11:41:31 AM, you wrote:
VS Hi,
VS I created to 3 x /dev/md1 to /dev/md3 which consist of six identical
VS 200GB hdd
VS my mdadm --detail --scan looks |
|
| |
| 107224804886_506760007265 | Mario BitKoenig Holb |
|
Hello Vladimir,
Tuesday, July 11, 2006, 11:41:31 AM, you wrote:
VS Hi,
VS I created to 3 x /dev/md1 to /dev/md3 which consist of six identical
VS 200GB hdd
VS my mdadm --detail --scan looks |
|
| |
| 124228654941_585760007631 | Neil Brown |
|
|
|
| |
| 168628334979_549460007625 | Tejun Heo |
|
|
|
| |
| 143723284444_514660007052 | Bill Davidsen |
|
On Tuesday July 11, htejun@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Christian Pernegger wrote:
The fact that the disk had changed minor numbers after it was plugged
back in bugs me a bit. (was sdc before, sde afte |
|
| |
| 139729684004_589360007945 | Justin Piszcz |
|
|
|
| |
| 114329914424_502960007613 | Justin Piszcz |
|
|
|
| |
| 129423004477_523560007205 | Christian Pernegger |
|
|
|
| |
| 186628434037_584460007663 | Molle Bestefich |
|
Hi!
I created a sw-raid md0 and a LVM above with four 250GB Samsung SATA
disks a couple of months ago. I am not an raid expert but I thought I
could handle it with a little help of my friends from g |
|
| |
| 146827744991_591360007984 | Henrik Holst |
|
Molle Bestefich <molle.bestefich <at gmail.com writes:
From the paste bin:
443: root <at ned ~ # mdadm --examine /dev/sd[abcd]
Shows that all 4 devices are ACTIVE SYNC....
|
|
| |
| 196523174952_597060007869 | Karl Voit |
|
Henrik Holst <henrik.holst <at idgmail.se writes:
Karl Voit wrote:
[snip]
Well this is because of the false(?) superblocks of sda-sdd in comparison
to
sda1 to sdd1.
I dont |
|
| |
| 191423534860_533860007918 | Karl Voit |
|
|
|
| |
| 195126764218_542860007375 | Karl Voit |
|
|
|
| |
| 163327774217_567060007554 | Karl Voit |
|
|
|
| |
| 133320874328_532360007247 | Karl Voit |
|
|
|
| |
