SEARCH  

NEWS

2010.10.06:11:36:28
Najpopularniejsze domeny dla Twojej firmy w nazwa.pl (reklama)
Myślisz o zdobyciu zagranicznych rynków? Chcesz mieć adresy WWW w najbardziej rozpoznawalnych domenach? A może chciałbyś zabezpieczyć swoją markę przed wykorzystaniem jej przez kogoś innego? Powinieneś więc rozważyć rejestrację firmowych adresów WWW zawierających najpopularniejsze rozszerzenia używane na świecie.

 

121525144694_589760007796Alex Chiang

 
115726964613_523260007808Greg KH
This patch adds the function to pciehp that generates udev events corresponding to the hotplug event. Signed-off-by: Taku Izumi <izumi.taku@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx --- drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp.h

 
115422254090_573060007236Taku Izumi
Hello Taku-san, * Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx : On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 06:02:22PM +0900, Taku Izumi wrote: This patchset adds an uevent framework to pci_hotplug. Why? What is this ne

 
180827374651_521960007276Greg KH
The reason Im asking is because, if youre looking to get a uevent emitted when the attention button is pressed or the MRL is opened, well... why do you need it? The operator knows he pressed

 
136426024005_519960007017Alex Chiang
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 05:29:11PM +0900, Taku Izumi wrote: Hi Greg, Alex This patchset adds an uevent framework to pci_hotplug. Why? What is this needed for? Who

 
108420574531_577960007999John Burr
* Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx : On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 06:40:56PM +0900, Taku Izumi wrote: The reason Im asking is because, if youre looking to get a uevent emitted when the attent

 
157421114695_518760007052Greg KH
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 10:56:44AM -0600, Alex Chiang wrote: * Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx : On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 05:29:11PM +0900, Taku Izumi wrote: Hi Greg, Alex This

 
199624984278_508660007806Yu Zhao
Hello! If I use the lspci linux-proc access method (-A linux-proc) only 32-bits of the memory BAR physical address is displayed, with the truncation occurring on the right. Example: ...

 
132220344543_597360007707Greg KH
Greg KH wrote: On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 05:29:11PM +0900, Taku Izumi wrote: Hi Greg, Alex This patchset adds an uevent framework to pci_hotplug. Why? What is this needed f

 
124926194308_525460007151Yu Zhao
Restore the volatile registers in the SR-IOV capability after the D3- D0 transition. Signed-off-by: Yu Zhao <yu.zhao@xxxxxxxxx --- drivers/pci/iov.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ driver

 
127129034209_580360007163Alex Chiang

 
180222554275_549660007619Yu Zhao
Add or remove a Virtual Function after receiving a Migrate In or Out Request. Signed-off-by: Yu Zhao <yu.zhao@xxxxxxxxx --- drivers/pci/iov.c | 119 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

 
154924374116_582760007344Greg KH
The reason Im asking is because, if youre looking to get a uevent emitted when the attention button is pressed or the MRL is opened, well... why do you need it? The operator knows he pressed

 
163328464378_517660007633Yu Zhao
Signed-off-by: Yu Zhao <yu.zhao@xxxxxxxxx --- Documentation/DocBook/kernel-api.tmpl | 1 + Documentation/PCI/pci-iov-howto.txt | 99 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 100

 
188320664251_519160007069John Burr
* Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx : On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 06:40:56PM +0900, Taku Izumi wrote: The reason Im asking is because, if youre looking to get a uevent emitted when the attent

 
134225934972_555260007653Yu Zhao
Hello! If I use the lspci linux-proc access method (-A linux-proc) only 32-bits of the memory BAR physical address is displayed, with the truncation occurring on the right. Example: ...

 
171621964908_599160007349Matthew Wilcox
If a device has the SR-IOV capability, initialize it (set the ARI Capable Hierarchy in the lowest numbered PF if necessary; calculate the System Page Size for the VF MMIO, probe the VF Offset, Stride

 
161022424787_572760007310Yu Zhao
Restore the volatile registers in the SR-IOV capability after the D3- D0 transition. Signed-off-by: Yu Zhao <yu.zhao@xxxxxxxxx --- drivers/pci/iov.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ driver

 
107027024155_544960007974Matthew Wilcox
On Thu, 19 Mar 2009 13:53:12 -0600 Matthew Wilcox <matthew@xxxxxx wrote: On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 03:25:42PM +0800, Yu Zhao wrote: +config PCI_IOV + bool "PCI IOV support"

 
108127604040_533260007361Yu Zhao

 
140222934954_537460007349Yu Zhao
Add or remove the Virtual Function when the SR-IOV is enabled or disabled by the device driver. This can happen anytime rather than only at the device probe stage. Signed-off-by: Yu Zhao <yu.zhao

 
102625614546_593460007239Yu Zhao
Add or remove a Virtual Function after receiving a Migrate In or Out Request. Signed-off-by: Yu Zhao <yu.zhao@xxxxxxxxx --- drivers/pci/iov.c | 119 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

 
128321614481_507060007550Linus Torvalds
Hi Linus, These are the PCI fixes that have been piling up for the last week while Jesses been on vacation. I dont think theres anything questionable here. All the patches have been posted to lin

 
138129604252_553760007129Yu Zhao
Signed-off-by: Yu Zhao <yu.zhao@xxxxxxxxx --- Documentation/DocBook/kernel-api.tmpl | 1 + Documentation/PCI/pci-iov-howto.txt | 99 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 100

 
151024904890_555160007842Yinghai Lu
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 12:22:56PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: On Tue, 10 Mar 2009, Matthew Wilcox wrote: These are the PCI fixes that have been piling up for the last week while Jesses be

 
191222244134_586660007980Yinghai Lu
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 01:36:05PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote: please dont use that one. and use "pci: dont disable too many HT MSI mapping -v4" instead I already said Im not comfortable

 
121526254541_576160007092Matthew Wilcox
If a device has the SR-IOV capability, initialize it (set the ARI Capable Hierarchy in the lowest numbered PF if necessary; calculate the System Page Size for the VF MMIO, probe the VF Offset, Stride

 
200028424254_548160007142Matthew Wilcox
On Mittwoch 11 März 2009 20:22:56 Linus Torvalds wrote: On Tue, 10 Mar 2009, Matthew Wilcox wrote: These are the PCI fixes that have been piling up for the last week while Jesses been

 
103022934102_528260007510Matthew Wilcox
On Thu, 19 Mar 2009 13:53:12 -0600 Matthew Wilcox <matthew@xxxxxx wrote: On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 03:25:42PM +0800, Yu Zhao wrote: +config PCI_IOV + bool "PCI IOV support"

 
141223404000_530260007823Yu Zhao

 
114328034047_527860007645Rafael J Wysocki
Commit 55633af3 (PCIe portdrv: Use driver data to simplify code) added a kfree of the driver private data in pcie_port_device_remove but forgot to remove the old kfree from pcie_portdrv_remove. Sign

 
125828844269_579960007828Harry Ciao
On Mon, 9 Mar 2009 12:08:15 -0600 Alex Chiang <achiang@xxxxxx wrote: Commit 55633af3 (PCIe portdrv: Use driver data to simplify code) added a kfree of the driver private data in pcie_port_de

 
189126444670_514560007582Yu Zhao
Add or remove the Virtual Function when the SR-IOV is enabled or disabled by the device driver. This can happen anytime rather than only at the device probe stage. Signed-off-by: Yu Zhao <yu.zhao

 
128721554876_538960007705Greg KH
Add the PCI Device ID for the PCI Bridge Controller on AMD8111 chip, which is used by AMD8111 EDAC driver. Signed-off-by: Harry Ciao <qingtao.cao@xxxxxxxxxxxxx --- include/linux/pci_ids.h |

 
190028514045_590060007937Greg KH

 
172322964740_577060007408Greg KH
Hi Kay, Greg, Ive been working on this patch series recently that adds function and device level hotplug into the PCI core: rel="nofollow" thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.pci/3495 thread

 
141528334292_568560007937Alex Chiang
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 08:04:53AM -0700, Greg KH wrote: On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 12:36:54AM -0600, Alex Chiang wrote: - discover that e00000018cac2920 is still hanging around! What do you

 
151325234581_518260007706Alex Chiang
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 10:50:10AM -0600, Alex Chiang wrote: I thought about the allocators returning a pointer to the same location that maybe has some valid looking data hanging around, but i

 
176429564861_563960007298Vegard Nossum
* Matthew Wilcox <matthew@xxxxxx : On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 10:50:10AM -0600, Alex Chiang wrote: I thought about the allocators returning a pointer to the same location that maybe has som

 
134422444149_539060007301Alex Chiang
* Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@xxxxxxxxx : 2009/3/9 Alex Chiang <achiang@xxxxxx : * Matthew Wilcox <matthew@xxxxxx : On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 10:50:10AM -0600, Alex Chiang wrote:

 
132628684598_506560007172Alex Chiang
From: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Introduce pci_is_root_bus helper function. This will help make code more consistent, as well as prevent incorrect assumptions (such as pci_b

 
147420524005_576660007638Alex Chiang
From: Trent Piepho <xyzzy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx pci_scan_slot() has been rewritten to be less complex and will now return the number of *new* devices found. Existing callers need not worry because they

 
170222494160_528260007829Kenji Kaneshige
We have a nice interface for re-scanning a PCI bus which will discover newly added devices, add them to the device tree, and enable them properly. Ensure that the bridge resources are properly sized

 
198821964784_584960007128Kenji Kaneshige
Hello Kenji-san, * Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx : Alex Chiang wrote: We have a nice interface for re-scanning a PCI bus which will discover newly added devices, add t

 
114721794373_529660007518Kenji Kaneshige
Hello Kenji-san, * Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx : Alex Chiang wrote: I hadnt gotten around to verifying/fixing existing callers of pci_do_scan_bus yet. I was foc

 
159828964385_519560007022Kenji Kaneshige
* Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx : Alex Chiang wrote: The more I think about it though, the more I think that even without the below patch to clean up the callers of pc

 
136824344074_537460007812Alex Chiang
This interface allows the user to force a rescan of all PCI buses in system, and rediscover devices that have been removed earlier. Cc: Trent Piepho <xyzzy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Cc: djwong@xxxxxxxxxx Re

 
101129024061_517260007494Alex Chiang
This is an updated version of this patch. It fixes a bug where we would remove a bridge even if it still had children. Now we check for children before attempting to remove the bridge. /ac commit

 
100021714690_578560007525Alex Chiang
* Alex Chiang <achiang@xxxxxx : * Alex Chiang <achiang@xxxxxx : This is an updated version of this patch. It fixes a bug where we would remove a bridge even if it still had children.

 
191421674704_528760007273Alex Chiang
* Alex Chiang <achiang@xxxxxx : * Alex Chiang <achiang@xxxxxx : This is an updated version of this patch. It fixes a bug where we would remove a bridge even if it still had children.