SEARCH  

NEWS

2010.10.06:11:36:28
Apple zapłaci 625,5 mln USD za naruszenie patentów?
Sąd uznał winę firmy Stevea Jobsa i nakazał jej wypłatę ogromnego odszkodowania. Ta jednak uważa, że racja jest po jej stronie i zapowiada dalszą walkę.

 

118626794080_536560007534Yongkui Han
Hi Yongkui, sorry for my late answering - I was out for a few days. Since I do not have full insigight to neither the driver nor the internal connections of the board I need to guess. maybe the dri

 
170429514546_522060007510Jean Delvare
The gkrellm package in Fedora Extras 6 has been patched to use libsensors. This causes it to fail to detect the voltage sensors on my Abit VP6 motherboard: [pilcher at home ~]$ gkrellm -d 0x80 ---

 
100825854960_501060007424Jean Delvare
Jean Delvare wrote: This is a bug in Fedora and/or gkrellm. What do you expect from us by reporting it on the lm_sensors list? I guess it would be a bug in gkrellm, since its making the assumpti

 
120521854799_534360007184Jean Delvare
The gkrellm package in Fedora Extras 6 has been patched to use libsensors. This causes it to fail to detect the voltage sensors on my Abit VP6 motherboard: [pilcher at home ~]$ gkrellm -d 0x80 ---

 
153921284292_588860007083Jean Delvare
Jean Delvare wrote: This is a bug in Fedora and/or gkrellm. What do you expect from us by reporting it on the lm_sensors list? I guess it would be a bug in gkrellm, since its making the assumpti

 
152921664763_560960007414DJ Barrow
Collected by a colleague of mine at work. may be useful in constructing a readme. /home/mmm/help/snmp #--ucdsnmp now known as net-snmp (5.) rel="nofollow" www.net-snmp.org/ www.net-snmp.org/

 
114322354364_568960007580Jean Delvare
Has anyone successfully managed to compile i2c 2.10.1 and lm_sensors 2.10.1 so that they work with kernels such as "2.6.9-42.0.2.ELsmp" as distributed with Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4? Fo

 
119924644165_515860007074DJ Barrow
Collected by a colleague of mine at work. may be useful in constructing a readme. /home/mmm/help/snmp #--ucdsnmp now known as net-snmp (5.) rel="nofollow" www.net-snmp.org/ www.net-snmp.org/

 
158226794259_538060007290Mark M Hoffman
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006, Jean Delvare wrote: Hi Steven, On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 10:59:20 -0500 (CDT), Steven Timm wrote: Has anyone successfully managed to compile i2c 2.10.1 and lm_sensors 2

 
156525624418_585760007398Jean Delvare
Has anyone successfully managed to compile i2c 2.10.1 and lm_sensors 2.10.1 so that they work with kernels such as "2.6.9-42.0.2.ELsmp" as distributed with Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4? Fo

 
194129794565_570360007096Mark M Hoffman
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006, Jean Delvare wrote: Hi Steven, On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 10:59:20 -0500 (CDT), Steven Timm wrote: Has anyone successfully managed to compile i2c 2.10.1 and lm_sensors 2

 
111627324331_548060007787Axel Thimm
The kernel as distributed by Red Hat in RHEL4 update 4 (2.6.9-42.0.3) has got an lm_sensors and i2c in there already but it is a very old version, 2.8.7. That is not new enough to sup

 
106026204251_522560007725Axel Thimm
The kernel as distributed by Red Hat in RHEL4 update 4 (2.6.9-42.0.3) has got an lm_sensors and i2c in there already but it is a very old version, 2.8.7. That is not new enough to sup

 
130023594404_555960007427Axel Thimm
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006, Jean Delvare wrote: Hi Steven, On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 10:59:20 -0500 (CDT), Steven Timm wrote: Has anyone successfully managed to compile i2c 2.10.1 and lm_sensors 2

 
185023044990_526860007439Axel Thimm
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006, Jean Delvare wrote: Hi Steven, On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 10:59:20 -0500 (CDT), Steven Timm wrote: Has anyone successfully managed to compile i2c 2.10.1 and lm_sensors 2

 
166621014417_523160007004Jean Delvare
J. Barons latest patch still reflects a pre-2.9.x version of lm_sensors as far as I can tell. I will try to open a ticket with Red Hat on this. Thanks Steve Timm On Mon, 30 Oct 2006, Axel Thimm

 
132729204736_565960007156Jean Delvare
J. Barons latest patch still reflects a pre-2.9.x version of lm_sensors as far as I can tell. I will try to open a ticket with Red Hat on this. Thanks Steve Timm On Mon, 30 Oct 2006, Axel Thimm

 
144524604777_569660007554Jean Delvare
Is the w83792d chip one of those supported in the newer 2.6 kernels? thats the main one I need that the current redhat distro kernel doesnt have. Also, which version of the Linus 2.6 kernel tree sh

 
142129864914_582660007654Jean Delvare
Is the w83792d chip one of those supported in the newer 2.6 kernels? thats the main one I need that the current redhat distro kernel doesnt have. Also, which version of the Linus 2.6 kernel tree sh

 
125223944958_524160007118Stephen Cormier
Hi, make in lm_sensors-2.10.1 stops running with this error: make: *** No rule to make target `mach_mpspec.h, needed by `kernel/chips/xeontemp.d. Stop. What am I doing wrong? Bye - Ingo.

 
168123284220_509760007023Stephen Cormier
Hi, make in lm_sensors-2.10.1 stops running with this error: make: *** No rule to make target `mach_mpspec.h, needed by `kernel/chips/xeontemp.d. Stop. What am I doing wrong? Bye - Ingo.

 
110228874944_583960007343James Olin Oden
Hi Mark/Eric & others, I am looking at backporting the lm93 driver ( lm93-driver-2.6.13-rc3-mm3-0001.bin ) to Linux version 2.6.9-34 Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 to meet a customer requirement. T

 
199529904804_577160007489James Olin Oden
Hi Mark/Eric & others, I am looking at backporting the lm93 driver ( lm93-driver-2.6.13-rc3-mm3-0001.bin ) to Linux version 2.6.9-34 Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 to meet a customer requirement. T

 
132521074474_523960007018Udo van den Heuvel
On 10/23/06, James Olin Oden <james.oden at gmail.com wrote: I do believe we already have a patch where I work. Ill send it to the list in a moment. In need to hunt it down. If we dont hav

 
189321854413_585160007074Udo van den Heuvel
Hi Udo, On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 11:26:20 +0200, Udo van den Heuvel wrote: I report that I have to use reset=1 for w83627hf to make my fans start again after booting the kernel on VIA Epia EK8000.

 
196921074403_518960007962Udo van den Heuvel
Hi Udo, On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 10:32:30 +0200, Udo van den Heuvel wrote: Jean Delvare wrote: On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 11:26:20 +0200, Udo van den Heuvel wrote: I report that I have to use reset=1

 
121323074849_515660007393Roy Erickson
Jean Delvare wrote: If "sensors -s" is run as part of your init scripts, please remove it and check again, Id like to get it out of the list of suspects. $PSENSORS -s is in the lm_s

 
150021404383_530360007068Yongkui Han
Hello Roy, Please use the more decent subject. IM NOT SHOUTHING AT YOU too. Best would be to install the lmsensors package from your distribution. Become root. Run sensors-detect script which will d

 
179322364175_526760007108Message not availabl
Hi, I have an Intel D850MV motherboard. There is an ADM1025A sensor chip on the motherboard. Also there is an LPC47M142 I/O chip on the motherboard. My CPU is a Pentium 4 CPU, 1.7GHz. And her

 
128523684293_569960007720Yongkui Han
Hi Yongkui, Thanks very much for your help. Well always good to hear it. Unfortunately I have not so much free time recently for this kind of lm-sensors support stuff. The pin numbers for the

 
177321874828_517660007032Rudolf Marek
Hi Rudolf, I calculated the time constant based on the temperature curve of "CPU temp". It is about 20 seconds. In my opinion, the time constant of the silicon chip is about 10 millisecon

 
113825904339_598760007484Yongkui Han
Hi Rudolf, Thank you for your reply. On 10/23/06, Rudolf Marek <r.marek at assembler.cz wrote: Hi Yongkui I calculated the time constant based on the temperature curve of "CPU

 
137922464625_576260007536Yongkui Han
Hi Rudolf, Forgot to include the attachment. Please check the attachment. Thank you! Yongkui On 10/25/06, Yongkui Han <hanyongkui99 at gmail.com wrote: Hi Rudolf, I drew the curve of

 
183123424773_500560007248Yongkui Han
I run the CPU burn benchmark for only 1 minute (plus 15 minutes system idle before running cpuburn, and 15 minutes system idle after cpuburn stops running), I even got the following message w

 
111428954616_540760007835Paul Aviles
Hello, I just installed a VIA Epia EK8000 board. It has w83697hf sensor chip, detected by sensors-detect. Temperature readings are high and do not move. Also changing set tempX Y to change diode, th

 
112723664022_595660007399Paul Aviles
Hi Paul, On Thu, 19 Oct 2006 17:18:21 -0400, Paul Aviles wrote: I have a weird question. The system I use are all the same, and one of them is really quiet and the others are somewhat louder in

 
198826804989_532760007734Paul Aviles
Hi Paul, On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 12:31:55 -0400, Paul Aviles wrote: Nice server.... [root at srv1 /]# sensors adt7463-i2c-0-2e Adapter: SMBus I801 adapter at 1480 ERROR: Cant get alarm mask da

 
181120454981_543560007530Rudolf Marek
Is this combination one of the ones thats not yet available? sensors-detect seems to work, but sensors says it cant find anything. Heres some output: [jhg at athena ~]$ lsmod|grep i2c i2c_i801

 
197226374872_574460007481Hans de Goede
Hello to the list. I have an HP Pavilion zv6069EA Laptop. Following your pages I succeeded in using i2c-piix4 with eeprom (but 1st question: what can I do now, since this is not a sensor?) and k8te

 
199227584375_560860007969Greg KH
Here are some hwmon fixes for 2.6.19-rc2. They have all been in the -mm tree for a while. Please pull from: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/hwmon-2.6.git/ or from: master.ker

 
144222934334_546560007877Greg KH
From: Grant Coady <gcoady.lk at gmail.com Replace a bouncing email that I cannot recover from Mr Google. Signed-off-by: Grant Coady <gcoady.lk at gmail.com Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <k

 
186422354556_585260007222Greg KH
From: Jean Delvare <khali at linux-fr.org The SMSC LPC47M112 Super-I/O chip appears to be compatible with the LPC47M10x and LPC47M13x as far as hardware monitoring is concerned. The device ID is

 
158623734267_556660007074Greg KH
From: Rudolf Marek <r.marek at assembler.cz Fix the detection of fan5 and preserve the bit between the register writes, because the bit is write only. Signed-off-by: Rudolf Marek <r.marek at

 
109627804712_596860007355David Hubbard
From: Jean Delvare <khali at linux-fr.org Fix debug messages in w83781d at detection time. We cant use dev_dbg() on an i2c clients device before calling i2c_attach_client() on that client. Sign

 
144925154112_582460007277Christian Mahr
Hi David, On Thu, 7 Dec 2006 14:01:19 -0700, David Hubbard wrote: Im doing bits and pieces of the w83627dhg driver, and I want to make sure I test it on the latest patched w83627ehf driver. I be

 
179225654571_512660007819Hamlet
Hi Christian, You have a w83627dhg, if I remember correctly. The current driver you are probably using is the testing driver from the lm-sensors mailing list in September. Although it functions corr

 
100228934054_555960007617David Hubbard
On Wed, 18 Oct 2006 15:55:10 -0300 Hamlet <hamletmun at fibertel.com.ar wrote: Winbond W83627DHG seems to be compatible with lm78 well, no not really.. the temp you get is MB temp, the cpu te

 
178223304991_504960007799David Hubbard
The patch will be for 2.6.19-rc2 or whichever kernel is the latest version. You should probably build a new kernel, as one of the things we would like to test is whether the patch compiles correctly

 
112329934579_583660007102Message not availabl
Hi Christian, Of yourse I can also test any newer version. I understand you want to make a separate driver for the W83627DHG for some 2.6.19-RC-xx? To be exact, the driver I sent you is for 2

 
119124094618_530360007741Christian Mahr
Hi Christian, Please include lm-sensors at lm-sensors.org in your reply so this will benefit others and get archived on the LM-sensors list. On 10/29/06, Christian Mahr <christian.mahr.ulm at ar